
This is what happens when I ”stop being polite, and start getting real.” Almost too much SEXY for anyone’s eyes to behold, surely.
So this is pretty much what my entire “vacation” looked like this year. I sat around the house not caring how I looked, and I watched a stupid amount of movies online, via Netflix.
And I ate…and ate…and ate. I ate food that I’d cooked myself. I ate takeout food. I ate hot foods, cold foods, and fried foods. I ate appetizers. I ate desserts. I ate all the leftovers. And at one point, when I couldn’t find the remote control, I suddenly realized…I’d probably eaten it.
But this rambling isn’t about what I look like with my hair in rollers and my face covered in a mixture of avacado, oatmeal, and clay. It isn’t about how many cups of coffee you need to drink before your right eye starts twitching uncontrallably (though I discovered the number). Nor is it about how much bigger my ass got during my break, or how many miles I will now have to jog to make said ass shrink again.
This blog’s offering is simple enough: since my time off consisted of watching DOZENS of films, I might as well share just a few of these titles and a brief review of each. Who knows?…maybe you’ll find one that becomes a favorite. So here they are…
TEN of the films I watched:
1. “The Man Who Cried” (2000. Christina Ricci, Johnny Depp, Cate Blanchett, John Turturro) – Awww, everyone enjoys a sad romantic story, right? This movie is a love story on two levels: there is the anticipated boy/girl romance, but there is also a heart-wrenching tale of the love between a father and a daughter. Suzie, a Russian Jew played by Ricci, loses her father as a child when he leaves the family in 1927 to make a better life in America. She never hears from him again, and wishes to go to America one day to find him. Right before WWII breaks out, Suzie immigrates to England, then Paris, and begins making a life for herself, mostly as a showgirl. She meets Blanchett’s character, who is the most annoying, social-climbing ho-dog you could imagine (though she does have a moment or two of kindness and redemption). Turturro’s character is pretty dispicable, too (the guy in charge of the theatre and its talent). Depp enters as the love interest – a wild, sensual, romantic gypsy (in fact, there may be no role on Earth more ideal for this man…except that of a pirate, of course. But I prefer the softness of the gypsy heart). Okay, so I’ve mentioned the words “World War II,” and I’ve mentioned the word “Jew,” so you can probably see where this is going…it ain’t your typical “happy ending”. Who survives and who doesn’t? Does Suzie ever lay eyes on her father again? And great balls of fire, who IS the man who freakin’ cries? Guess you’ll have to watch to find out.
Overall Grade: B- This film was good…but not great. An unidentifiable little “something” was missing. Still, it has some touching moments, so it’s worth a try. A couple of the high points include beautiful sets/decor/locations, and even a SINGING Christina Ricci, who has a sweet little voice, as it turns out. Some of the music/songs featured in the film are truly beautiful. Plus, it’s always fun to watch gypsies get drunk as skunks and dance at a gypsy party. Yeah!
2. “Painted Angels” (1998. Brenda Fricker, Kelly McGillis) – Yes, you read that right: Kelly McGillis. As in TOP GUN’s ”hot blonde” Kelly McGillis, back in 1986. We haven’t seen her for a while, have we? Well, back in 1998, she was in this little-known film, and I dig what happened to her. Yes, she aged. Yes, she gained some weight. Yes, she looks a little rough. And I LOVE it. By the time she filmed this, you can tell…she is a REAL woman, a STRONG woman, who has truly come into her own, and she’s no longer content to just be a walking, talking “doll” for the men of the world who would like to keep her that way. Yay for Kelly. She and several other bright, talented women shine in this film. Set in the “Old West” in the 1870′s, the movie provides a long glimpse into the day-to-day life of prostitutes who live and work in the town brothel. If you’re one of the aforementioned immature men who’s only interested in lots of T&A and sex scenes, move on. This film is NOT for you. This movie is for the ladies (and MATURE men) who want to see the mental and emotional results that stem from a lifetime of limited choice and complete desperation, where there was no alternative to becoming a piece of property, used by everyone.
Overall Grade: A- VERY good film, but if you’re looking for action and fast pacing (and fantasy), look elsewhere. This is a film for the emotionally mature and the psychologically curious. And some moments are pretty grim. Not exactly a “feel good” film, if you know what I mean. But it certainly makes you think – especially if you’re a woman.
3. “Doctor Zhivago (2002 Mini Series. Keira Knightley and Hans Matheson) – Everybody, I’d like you to meet my new celebrity crush, HANS MATHESON:

And this guy is a lot more than just handsome (and I’m not gonna talk about him like he’s a piece of meat, as I can’t stand that done to women) — this guy actually has some serious acting chops, and one has to wonder why he isn’t in more movies that you’ve heard of. Then you watch him in interviews, and you realize he’s a true artiste – he’s being picky with his role choices, as he should be, and he’s not in it to become rich or to be a “star”. He also has several talents/passions besides just acting. Then there’s Keira Knightley, who is often given a bad rap and is picked on mercilessly because “she’s thin”. Well, big deal. There are naturally big people, and there are naturally thin people. She just happens to be naturally thin. If you can get past these two people’s physical appearances – whether you like them or not – you’re going to find that they absolutely ROCK the two main roles of Zhivago and Laura. Epic love, indeed.
Most of us know the story (from the classic novel) of “Doctor Zhivago”: it’s Russia, it’s cold, it’s the Bolshevik Revolution, it’s cold, there’s a lot of sickness and death, it’s cold, and there’s an epic three-way love story going on between Zhivago, his wife, and his mistress…and it’s freakin’ cold. Russia ALWAYS looks too damned cold. I had to put on a coat just to watch the film.
The chemistry between the two main characters is electric. And Knightley, unbelievably, was only about 16 years old when this was made, proving that she could handle a very difficult and complex role, despite her youth. This movie offers stunning (cold) locations, and amazing costumes, hair, and makeup. It’s beautifully written, directed, and acted…all around. It’s pitch perfect. This film was so well done, as a matter of fact, that I even thought it was better than the 1960′s version starring Julie Christie – and that’s saying a LOT. It is also much more faithful to the Pasternak novel. You can watch it on Netflix in two parts: part 1 is 112 minutes long, part 2 is 113 minutes. Trust me – every minute will be worth your time.
Overall Grade: A+ Kiddos, put on your ushankas, pour yourselves some vodka, and prepare for great cinema! Chtob vse byli zdorovy!
4. “Unhitched” (2005. Stuart Townsend, Amy Smart, Seth Green) – I really wanted to like this film, because I adore Stuart, Amy is always lovely to behold, and Seth…well, I’ve actually never liked Seth Green. AT ALL. But it was just IMPOSSIBLE to like this movie. It was supposed to be a romantic comedy, but I wasn’t laughing. In fact, by the end of the movie, I felt like punching somebody. If any of YOU would like to have an experience that is somewhat similar to a viewing of this film, follow these steps:
A) Go to the nearest cat litter box. Preferably right after the cat of the house has dropped a fresh, warm turd. B) Place your face right over the soiled litter. C) Throw a blanket over your head and the catbox, trapping yourself inside with the odor. D) Inhale deeply. E) Stay in place and continue to inhale…for 95 minutes, no stopping. And don’t you dare cheat. I didn’t. I sat and watched this fiasco in its entirety, and I want you to suffer just as much as I did.
Overall Grade: F- – - - I wasted 95 minutes of my life, and I want them back.
5. “Harlow” (1965. Carroll Baker, Red Buttons, Angela Lansbury, Raf Vallone)–
Before Marilyn Monroe, Veronica Lake, Ginger Rogers, Jane Mansfield, Madonna, and all the rest, there was JEAN HARLOW. This movie is a biopic of her life. The original “platinum blonde”, Harlow rose to fame in the 1930′s, becoming an international sex symbol and movie icon. Her image wowed men, and sent women all over America running to the salon to get their hair bleached in an attempt to become – like her – a “blonde bombshell”. But like many gorgeous women, her life would be fraught with private suffering. For as any beautiful woman can tell you, “pretty” is not all it’s cracked up to be. Instead, it’s the ultimate trap. To have beauty is to be an OBJECT to most people…to be idealized and not taken seriously…to have women be envious and hate you…to have men lust after you, but never truly care about you…to have most people only see the pretty “shell”, but not the true person within. It is a life of irony – constantly being surrounded by people who are curious and admiring, but only on a surface level, and only until they’ve come to be jealous or resent you (the women) or until they have already used your body - or realized they don’t have a chance at using your body (the men)…unfairly leaving you to remain untouched by real love of any kind for your entire life…and often – if you refuse to play the game anymore – to die alone. You have my sympathy, Jean. May you now be resting in peace…
Overall grade: C-/A- This one is divided. The C- is because they actually get a lot of facts about Ms. Harlow’s life WRONG. A quick check at Wikipedia and official sites will show you as much, and if you’re a fan, like I am, the mistakes will be GLARINGLY obvious. The A- is because Carroll (two r’s, two l’s) Baker does an amazing job as Harlow – especially with such sparse and false material to work with. At least you get a glimpse of how heartless a place Hollywood could be, and how it could eat up someone so young, sweet and vulnerable as Jean (she died a terrible death at the tender age of 26). The movie shows how Jean tried to please everyone - from her annoying “stage mother”, to her greedy, lazy step father, to an obsessed and adoring public, to all the executives, producers and everyone at the top who picked her bones and threw her out once they were done with her. Just make sure you check the REAL facts once you’ve finished this glamorous bit of fluff…
6. “Last Night” (2010. Guillaume Canet, Keira Knightley, Eva Mendes, Sam Worthington) – Over my “vacay” (I have to keep using quotes, because it didn’t feel like a true vacation, though it was nice to rest for a few days), I watched probably 30-plus movies (and read two novels as well…I was busy), and somehow Keira Knightley ended up being in about 5 of them. I’m not obsessed with her, and I didn’t do that on purpose. But I was out to choose a very random set of movies with a wide variety of subjects/topics, and apparently, Keira has already played a wide variety of roles, so she keeps popping up. Fine by me, as her work in this film – as well as most of her others - was quite good. All four of the main cast were quite convincing in their roles – Keira, as the married woman who has an “okay” union with her man, but senses something slightly amiss; Sam, who has (so-far) been the faithful husband, but is getting just a little too close to his sexy co-worker; Eva, who plays said sexy co-worker, who nails her “sex-pot seductress” role perfectly; and Guillaume, who – for Keira’s character – is an ex-boyfriend, the “one who got away”. Long story short: in 24 hours, both Joanna (Keira) and Michael (Sam) will be offered tempting opportunities to cheat on their spouse. Will they?…
Overall Grade: A …a SOLID A. And the most interesting part is that it raises that oft-asked question: Which type of betrayal is worse…physical, or one that is purely emotional? IS one worse? Or are they equally wrong and harmful to others? And I especially like the way the director ended the film. Definitely one to see, if you like a realistic, well-done drama about relationships. P.S…The movie introduced me to my new celebrity crush #2: Guillaume Canet. His smile just KILLS, and he’s immensely intelligent and talented (check out some of his interviews).
7. “Tess of the D’Urbervilles” (1998 Mini Series. Justine Waddell, Oliver Milburn) – Men, I’d like you to meet YOUR new celebrity crush. The little-known but UBER-talented JUSTINE WADDELL:

Justine was absolutely STUNNING – not just physically, but emotionally – as the title character in this film adaptation of Thomas Hardy’s novel. She was a wonder to behold, her face and eyes full of so much emotion and expression as to be almost unbelievable. I couldn’t look away. Again, a two part mini-series, much like Zhivago (above). Both parts together run a total of about 176 minutes. The time flew, and I had to watch some parts a second time. Oliver Milburn does a fair turn as Angel (and became my new celebrity crush #3), but you end up hating his character for a while after what he does to poor Tess — he’s a DICK! You just want to slap him. Which means he did his job.
For those who haven’t read the book, I don’t want to spoil everything. But here are some abbreviated notes: Victorian England / stupid “rules” of society / double standards / a “fallen” girl (read: HUMAN girl) who is punished way too much and for way too long for having had a “human” moment / and last but not least, the irony that the accused “fallen” girl actually has a heart and personality more pure than any of the people holding her back and putting her down. Ahhhh, life during the Victorian Era…but we can certainly see similar scenarios played out today, can we not?
Overall Grade: A I cried while watching this. Several times. Sappy?…Yeah. But so what? Get your box of tissues out and enjoy. Even you dudes. I won’t tell anyone. Promise.
8. “The Nature of Existence” (2010. Documentary, directed by Roger Nygard) – Oh, how I LOVE documentaries…especially when they deal with such controversial subjects as God, religion, and the reason for existence. I watched several of these over my break, including “The Case for Christ”, “The Case for Faith”, “The God Who Wasn’t There”, and of course THIS one, “The Nature of Existence”. Let me be honest – NONE of these documentaries proved, to any degree whatsoever, that there either IS or ISN’T a God…though goodness knows that most of them tried. Hard. They failed. But “The Nature of Existence” was at least UNBIASED. The director, Nygard, fairly interviewed every type of person, with every type of opinion or belief, from ALL OVER THE WORLD. He seemed a lot like myself – someone who is truly agnostic…questioning, learning, and searching with an open mind. The end result may not be any one particular “answer”, but it certainly gives you a lot to mentally chew on. Filled with tons of information and arguments (both for AND against God/religion), it’s a “thinker” and a “conversation-starter”, to be sure…
Overall Grade: B- I give it a slightly lower grade because it’s obvious that Nygard had a low (SUPER-low) budget to work with here, and that given more funds, he could have done a lot more. The talent is there. His questions and ideas are sound and well thought out. The premise is broad and difficult for ANYONE to tackle and wrap into a neat little package, but he gave it a solid effort, and made a little go a long way. Oh, and one more slight drawback: Nygard, who also narrates the film, has a VERY nasal voice. Not very easy on the ears. But he can’t help that either, God bless him (or not?)…
9. “The Music Lovers” (1970. Richard Chamberlain, Glenda Jackson) – A film based on the life and work of the famous classical composer Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. Tchaikovsky being one of my favorites of all time (I just ADORE The Russian composers!), I couldn’t wait to sit down to this movie. But alas, you never know what you’re going to get when A) the film is based on a REAL person, not a fictional character, and B) it was made in the 1970′s. Seventies cinema can be…ummm…how should we say? A little dicey. At best.
On the negative side, I was expecting at least SOME bending of the truth, as happens with almost every biographic film about a famous person, and I was not disappointed (which is to say, I WAS disappointed). On the positive side, I was hoping for, at the very least, some lush (cold) landscapes and bad-ass period clothing. Check. Found them. And I was expecting some great music, passed down by the master Tchaikovsky himself. Double check. The soundtrack was phenomal, of course. But some of the scenes were…distracting and confusing and just plain WACKY. Suddenly there would be a sequence where Tchaikovsky and several other characters would be dressed in fancy attire, dancing in the middle of a forest for no reason whatsoever, and then you’d cut back to a live concert. Whafuck??? Then there’s that absolutely crackhead cuckoo wife of his. As fans of Tchaikovsky know, he was a gay man, but he married a woman (as society expected him to do), and she was a real piece of work. In the film, Glenda Jackson goes above and BEYOND in this role, and I’m not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Watching her roll around on the floor of a moving train, naked and snarling, for an extended period of time, I started to feel like I was going nuts. I feared for my sanity. I mean, the woman goes BATSHIT crazy.
Overall Grade: C The film doesn’t completely suck, but the grade is lowered for the scenes that travel WAY into melodramatic/cheeseball territory. Like I said, we’re dealing with 1970′s cinema here.
10. “Melancholia” (2011. Kirsten Dunst, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Kiefer Sutherland, Alexander Skarsgard) —

And I’ve saved the best for last. Ladies and gentlemen, “Melancholia” is MAJOR. It is SRS. BSNS. Director Lars Von Trier might be controversial, but he has created a modern masterpiece with this work.
Often tagged as ”a beautiful film about the end of the world”, it’s exactly that, but also much, much more. Kirsten Dunst plays Justine, a woman plagued with depression. Her illness causes her to act eratically, hurt those around her, and ruin her own wedding. Charlotte Gainsbourg plays her sister, Claire. Claire has always been the stronger, more responsible sister, tending to Justine when she’s sick and trying to be the glue that holds the family together. But an interesting thing happens over the course of the movie: as it is understood that a rogue planet “Melancholia” is headed for Earth and all life will soon be destroyed, Claire starts to become the weaker, more terrified sister, and Justine becomes strong and calm. In the end, it will be Justine who helps Claire (and Claire’s young son) to accept and face “the end”.
Von Trier often deals with extremely “dark” material, so it seems natural for him to tackle both depression AND the destruction of Earth in just one film. Since he, himself, has suffered from depression, he was able to reveal several important points about the disease — one of the more interesting facts being that of all people, it is often the most depressed who are able to remain calm in a true crisis situation. Realizing this, he began to write and develop “Melancholia”.
Heavy subject matter? Yes, indeed. But that’s where the greatest inspiration can often come from – the darkness.
I used to have to deal with this truly AWFUL person who lives in Hot Springs, and if I ever wrote anything on Facebook or my blog that was even half-way “dark”, he’d start in with crap like, ”You’re such a negative person, blah, blah, blah, nonsense, nonsense, etc.” How ridiculous, ignorant, and judgmental (and I’m SO glad he’s not in my life and I don’t have to deal with his CONSTANT criticism anymore). Like the great Morrissey said himself: “I’m actually a very happy, POSITIVE person. But I’m realistic, as well. Bad things happen. Sometimes I write about them, too.”
Life is full of good AND bad. A well-rounded artist (or any healthy, sane person, for that matter) recognizes and expresses BOTH. Great ART recognizes and expresses both. This movie, without question, is great art.
This film is getting a lot of comparisons with another recently released film called “The Tree of Life”, and I love both – they are fantastic. But in my book, Von Trier gets extra props because “sweet and beautiful” is easy, but total hopelessness and annihilation is meatier and takes much bigger balls…and Von Trier isn’t afraid to “go there”. He’s holding the evil and obliteration of the world right in your face. He’s making you see it ALL. He shows you the darkness, the pointlessness of everything, and the absolute END…yet he does so in the most visually stunning and artistic way possible. I like to call Melancholia “‘The Tree of Life’ for the Stronger and Less Naive Person”. Are YOU ready to go there?
Overall Grade: A ++++++++ Von Trier KILLED it with this one. And if Kirsten Dunst doesn’t get a nomination for Best Actress at the Academy Awards this year, I’m gonna start a riot up in this bitch.
Note: I watched “Melancholia” BEFORE it was released in theatres, on Amazon.com (you can watch it as a streaming/online rental. It is NOT available yet on Netflix). The movie is only showing in theatres in a HANDFUL of cities, and Arkansas won’t even have a theatrical release until December 9th, and only in ONE theatre (Market Street Cinema). For a full list of theatre release dates, you can go here: http://askarsgard.com/?p=21514, but I imagine for many, Amazon.com is still your best bet.
Okay, I’m exhausted from so much entertainment in such a short amount of time. Too much information, both in and out. I need to rest for a while so I can start jogging again. I have to save my ass. Until later…
http://youtu.be/0tbVPpeUUW8